Primena standarda pristupačnosti

Featured

Misija Udruženja za reviziju pristupačnosti je stručna pomoć prilikom primene standarda pristupačnosti. Svakodnevni rad na uklanjanju arhitektonskih barijera i savetovanje zainteresovanih čini nas najiskusnijim u ovoj oblasti u Srbiji. Istovremeno se trudimo da naša znanja unapređujemo u kontaktima sa evropskim stručnjacima.

U arhitektonsko-građevinskoj oblasti radimo:

Izradu projektnog zadatka,
Izradu idejnog rešenja uklanjanja arhitektonske barijere,
Izradu Elaborata ispunjavanja standarda pristupačnosti,
Pribavljanje dozvola,
Pomoć pri raspisivanju tendera za izvođače radova i
Nadzor radova
U opštoj oblasti primene standarda pristupačnosti radimo:
Izradu Revizije pristupačnosti u skladu sa preporukama stručnjaka Evropske Mreže Pristupačnosti (razvijene uz pomoć Saveta Evrope)
Izradu održivog plana pristupačnosti – Plana koji omogućava da se tokom više godina planski u potpunosti premene standardi pristupačnosti, čime se postiže ušteda, pruža se mogućnost projektnog finansiranja itd.
Pitanja, komentare i predloge za saradnju pošaljite na vidan.dankovic(at*)pristupacnost.org *(at) zamenite znakom @
Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Pomoć prilikom uklanjanja arhitektonskih barijera

Featured

Udruženje za reviziju pristupačnosti (URP) je neprofitno udruženje građana, koje okuplja vec priznate pojedince i organizacije koje se zalažu za izgradnju i primenu standarda pristupačnosti u cilju stvaranja okruženja koje koristi svim ljudima.
Pojedinci i organizacije koji čine URP ujedno su i aktivni članovi prestižnih međunarodnih organizacija i mreža – Mreže evropskog koncepta pristupačnosti (EuCAN) i Evropskog instituta za dizajn za sve (EIDD). Želja nam je da se postojeća znanja, iskustva i resursi pojedinaca i organizacija unaprede i učine još efikasnijim i efektivnijim.

Organizacijama za pomoć starima i organizacijama osoba sa invaliditetom kao i organima lokalne samouprave Udruženje za Reviziju Pristupačnosti nudi:
• Konsultacije u oblasti primene standarda pristupačnosti – Izrada projektnog zadatka, idejnog rešenja, izrada Elaborata ispunjavanja standarda pristupačnosti, pribavljanje dozvola, pomoć pri raspisivanju tendera za izvođače radova i nadzor radova;
• Izrada revizije pristupačnosti u skladu sa preporukama Mreže Evropskog koncepta pristupačnosti;
• Izrada održivog plana pristupačnosti.

Pristupačnost podrazumeva sve ono što svakom pojedincu omogućava da samostalno živi i učestvuje u svim aspektima života, na jednakoj osnovi. Izgradnja pristupačnog okruženja nije samo ispunjavanje zakonskih obaveza i dodatna gradnja pomagala za 10% stanovnika (čuvena procena populacije osoba sa invaliditetom u nekom društvu), već potreba i do 40% stanovnika, starih, dece, trudnica, roditelja sa decom u kolicima, dok 100% stanovništva oseća poboljšanje u korišćenju predmeta i usluga, poboljšanje u kretanju i snalaženju u prostoru.

Pošaljite opis arhitektonske barijere, pitanja u vezi novog Zakona o planiranju i izgradnji i potrebnoj dokumentaciji, i vaše predloge:
kontakt osoba: Vidan Danković, vidan.dankovic(at)*pristupacnost.org, www.pristupacnost.org *(at) zamenite sa znakom @

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Adaptacija kulturno-istorijskog spomenika

Prenosim prepisku izmedju Dzona Pentona (John Penton) koji je angazovan na adaptaciji katedrale Svetog Pavla u Londonu i uvazenog clana Evropskog instituta za Dizajn za sve Pita Kercera (Pete Kercher) koja se odvijala na LinkedIn-u u okviru grupe Design for all

Dzon objasnjava sta je sve u proteklih deset godina uradjeno kako bi cuveni kulturno-istorijski spomenik, katedrala Svetog Pavla u Londonu bila pristupacna svima. Izvinjavam se clanovima koji ne znaju engleski. Ukoliko bude dovoljan broj zainteresovanih za prevod, prevescemo  ;)
John Penton: For the last 10 years St Paul’s Cathedral in London has been benefiting from a major conservation programme. As part of that programme I have been working with the ‘Surveyor to the Fabric’ – the architect for the project, Martin Stancliffe, advising the church authorities on developing an improved culture of Accessibility for the 2M visitors, the congregation and the clergy. We have already implemented many changes, alterations and additions. Black granite step nosings are now indicated with bronze studs; handrails have been added; a ‘wheelchair’ lift has been installed serving all five levels up the the ‘whispering gallery’ in the dome; there are accessible lavatories; there is a fully accessible education centre; eleven level changes in the crypt have been eliminated; in the crypt the ‘Oculus’ (Award winning) has been installed providing a sound and vision presentation which offers a virtual tour of those upper areas that remain inaccessible to many; induction loop hearing support has been installed; signage and published information have been/are being completely reviewed and re-designed; staff awareness training has been introduced; a new ‘ramped’ access to the cathedral floor level is under development; a new accessible entrance for the public generally has now been opened; improvement of he surrounding churchyards is in progress; he ‘Chapter House’ – the Cathedral’s staff and office accommodation – is about to be completely gutted, altered, extended and made fully accessible; etc, etc. It is all ‘work in progress’ and represents a programme intended to bring universal benefit to all. Incidentally, [b]the reaction from people generally is that it all looks good too, and is bringing in even more visitors, even though it is happening to a really iconic historic building.[/b]

Pete Kercher: John, thanks for your comment and background information. I had already heard good reports about this project. Is there any online data abot it? A project description, indicating how users/stakeholders/members of the public were involved in the design and execution, would be of great value, especially if accompanied by some before-and-after photographs.
There is always a great need to showcase examples of good practices and there is no doubt that a famous building like St. Paul’s also adds extra force to the argument. If there is such a database, can you add an online line here? Thanks!

John Penton: I am currently preparing a ‘Ten Years On’ report for the Dean and Chapter. Much if not all the content should be available on line by this autumn.In undertaking all the work so far the consultation process has involved :

1 Obtaining continuous ‘ad hoc’ consumer reaction/response information throughout the audit and implementation stages, project by project.

2 A standing ‘Accessibility Implementation Group’ with regular meetings twice a year, or on a response basis if needed, with representationincluding an informed individual or individuals with a physical disability, an informed individual or individuals with a sensory disabilityclergy, virgers, stewards (accessibility awareness trained), ’management, the ‘architect’ and the ‘Clerk of the Works’, and myself.

3 A standing ‘Accessibility Advisory Group’ with regular meetings twice a year, or on a response basis if needed, with representation includingindividuals with physical (mobility related), visual and auditory disabilities, plus an elderly person(s), and including the City of LondonAccess Officer and a member of the City of London consultative ’Access Group’ drawn from local residents, clergy, virgers ( accessibilityawareness trained), ‘management’, the ‘architect’ and the Clerk of the Works’, and myself.

4 Occasional ‘special’ site/project meetings with disabled consumers, and with English Heritage, City of London Corporation Officers, officialsthe Commission on Architecture and the Built Environment, and other statutory and consultative bodies.

5 Occasional visits by groups of members of the City of London Access Group, together with their invited guests.

John Penton

(http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=52953350&gid=1890533&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_pd-pmr-cn)

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

“Grad pristupačan za sve”

ilustracija_gradJuče sam pročitao bombastičan naslov na zvaničnoj prezentaciji glavnog grada “Grad pristupačan za sve”. Obzirom da znam da je za ovo potrebna ozbiljna makar petogodišnja strategija (Helsinki), pomislio sam “Ovo je možda to! Početak ozbiljnog rada na pristupačnosti!” Ali ne! Čitao sam patetičnu priču o Tamari koja je završavala “razgovor uz nežan pokret rukom preko duge plave kose, blag osmeh i reči izvinjenja, jer žuri na svoje radno mesto.”. ?! Ocenu pristupačnosti grada u jednom jedinom pasusu je zatim izneo „autoritet“ g. Darko Ivić, „predsednik Savetodavnog tela osoba sa invaliditetom pri kabinetu gradonačelnika“ (kopiram ceo tekst): „Prilagođen je Bulevar kralja Aleksandra, centar grada je prilično sređen. Sada ćemo se fokusirati na to da i delovi van centra, kao i najvažnije institucije i objekti budu prilagođeni invalidima. Sada su i velike hale poput „Pionira”, „Arene”, ali i Sportskog centra „Vračar”, dostupni osobama sa invaliditetom. U planu je da se i ostali sportski centri u gradu prilagode. Ada je zaista pristupačna, urađeni su prilazi plaži, toaleti i tuš-kabine. „ ?!?!  Već iz ovoga se vidi da grad nije pristupačan za sve jer je „centar grada prilično sređen“ a najvažnije institucije i objekti nisu prilagođeni kao ni ostali sportski centri (pored navedenih). O onome šta je i kako urađeno da bi bilo pristupačno (a bogami ima se tu svašta napisati) napisaću par redova kasnije, prvo da se razumemo oko osnovne ideje, odnosno oko toga šta mislimo kada kažemo „Grad pristupačan za sve“?

„Grad za sve“ je oznaka kvaliteta. „Grad za sve“ pre svega znači da je obezbeđeno da usluge i informacije svih  javnih objekata dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom koriste svi. Podsećanja radi, u javne objekte spadaju zgrade opština, domovi zdravlja, pošte, banke, zgrade pozorišta, muzeja, škola i obdaništa,  turističkih objekata itd. Podrazumeva se da je obezbeđeno da dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom do njih svi mogu i doći (prilagođen javni transport i infrastruktura). To se dakle podrazumeva! Ali pošto to ne obezbeđuje i kompletan provod – „Grad za sve“ svakako mora imati i pristupačne kafane i restorane i zašto ne – noćne klubove (možda će neka osoba sa invaliditetom poželeti uveče da se provede – ko zna!).

„Grad za sve“  komunicira sa svojim građanima, ali ne putem bilborda i naručenih tekstova. Komunicira da gradske službe vode računa o tome kako će neko dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom stići iz tačke A u tačku B, koristiti usluge ili uživati u tački B i dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom se vratiti u tačku A. Čak iako tačke A i B nisu u strogom centru grada!

Nekoliko puta sam napisao „dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom“ jer je to kriterijum kojim se meri pristupačnost. Osobe sa invaliditetom, stari ljudi, roditelji sa decom u kolicima, strani i domaći turisti, dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom treba da se kreću kroz grad, uz asistenciju info tabli i logično uređene pešačke komunikacije i bez barijera. Dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom treba da prepoznaju i koriste usluge koje postoje zbog njih. Dostojanstveno i sa lakoćom treba da budu dočekani i ispraćeni iz grada…

Prihvatam da je potrebno dosta znanja, vremena i novca da neki grad postane „Grad za sve“. Ali da li mi imamo plan (pošto imamo želju) kako i kada ćemo to da postignemo? Da li smo zadužili neku službu da o tome vodi računa? Da li smo ih obučili šta da gledaju? Da li smo postavili rokove do koje godine će biti pristupačne sve zgrade opština i recimo pozorišta? Sve škole i obdaništa? Javni prevoz i infrastruktura?

„Grad za sve“ je oznaka kvaliteta za humanije okruženje. „Grad za sve“ uvažava potrebe svih, kako bi se ljudi osećali lepo i kako bi zauzvrat lepo i vraćali. Pokazati da brineš iziskuje napor ali ne nužno i novac. Da li smo mi uložili napor da nešto smisleno isplaniramo i da nekoga zadužimo da to sprovede u delo? Mislim da nismo…

Vidan Danković

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Заједнички апел да се обезбеди приступачност свим јавним објектима особама са инвалидитетом

Заједнички апел да се обезбеди приступачност свим јавним објектима особама са инвалидитетом
петак, 25. фебруар 2011. 16:24
Заштитник грађана Републике Србије  је у току 2010. године примио 101 притужбу особа са инвалидитетом, од којих су 60 посто биле основане. То упућује на чињеницу да су повреда права тих грађана била сасвим евидентна, истакао је заштитник грађана Саша Јанковић на данашњем представљању нацрта Алтернативног извештаја о спровођењу Конвенције Уједињених нација о правима особа са инвалидитетом, у Београду. 

Оно на шта је омбудсман указао је да је лоше што је овој институцији стигао мали број притужби преко организација особа са инвалидитетом.

Пројекат „Јачање капацитета организација особа са инвалидитетом за учешће у консултативном процесу и праћењу примене УН Конвенције“ реализовао је Центар за самостални живот особа са инвалидитетом Србије у партнерству са Националном организацијом особа са инвалидитетом Србије уз финансијску подршку Делегације Европске Уније у Србији.

Председница Центра за самостални живот особа са инвалидитетом Гордана Рајков представљајући извештај рекла да је кључно у потпуности обезбедити приступачност свим институцијама и јавним објектима особама са инвалидитетом.

Невена Петрушић, повереница за заштиту равноправности је истакла да је њена институција још нова и није довољно видљива, као и да не располаже довољним капацитетом за рад, али да грађани свакако морају да искористе овлашћења ове институције.

Омбудсман и повереница су заједнички позвали невладине организације да пруже подршку у раду и у напорима ових институција, како би и оне могле што квалитетније и успешније да заштите и унапреде права грађана.

Удружење за ревизију приступачности се прикључује овом апелу.

 

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Teaching & Learning | Surface | University of Salford – A Greater Manchester University

 

 

Teaching & Learning | Surface | University of Salford – A Greater Manchester University.

Please note that applications are now being considered for a programme start date of September 2011.

A welcome message from SURFACE Director, Prof Marcus Ormerod


Welcome to Accessibility & Inclusive Design, the highest achieving programme within the School of the Built Environment at the University of Salford. We were established in 2002, three years in advance of changes to UK building regulations to improve access to and use of the built environment.

We welcome learners with all types of interest in Accessibility & Inclusive Design, enabling students to undertake projects in their own area of expertise, as well as widening their understanding of the needs of others, be they clients, users, planners, designers or health professionals. 

We have designed our three levels of award so that they are as supportive and inclusive as possible, with learners studying on a part-time basis wherever and whenever it suits them. 15% of current students are non-UK based and 90% studying while employed.

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Tramvaj zvani želja…

 

 

 

Apelujemo  na nadležne organe , posebno na  Direkciju za javni prevoz da u što kraćem roku reši problem nepristupačnih stajališta kako bi i našim sugradjanima, osobama sa invaliditetom, bila omogućena ova usluga javnog prevoza. Tim pre što će ove godine, kako najavljuju, na beogradske šine stići barem još sedam  ovakvih tramvaja, a do kraja 2012. –e godine, u saobraćaj će biti pušteno svih 30 tramvaja.

Rapme su automatske, dakle, spuštaju se pritiskom na dugme, nema ništa ručno – objašnjava Ivanović. – Utvrdićemo zašto se ovo desilo, ali mnogo veći problem predstavljaju peroni, odnosno stajališta koja nisu prilagođena invalidima. Recimo, na liniji „7“ kojom se sada kreće prvi tramvaj pušten u saobraćaj, peroni su rađeni na različitim visinama. Jedino je 12 stajališta, po šest sa obe strane, u lane rekonstruisanom Bulevaru kralja Aleksandra urađeno kako treba. Inače, za njihovo prilagođavanje zadužena je Direkcija za javni prevoz i već je u izradi projekta prilagođavanja na preostalom delu trase linije „7“. Ipak, neće biti moguća prepravka svih stanica, jer na pojedinim mestima nema zdovoljne širine perona. Osim stajališta, sugrađanima u invalidskim kolicima često su nepristupačni i trotoari.”  Novi tramvaj prevezao 10.000 ljudi | Beograd | Novosti.rs.

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Global Universal Design Commission (GUDC)

Global Universal Design Commission (GUDC) is a not-for-profit corporation, was established to develop Universal Design (UD) standards for buildings, products and services. GUDC is currently developing UD voluntary consensus standards for commercial buildings, which will expand access to buildings for all people, regardless of physical stature and varying abilities. The approved UD standards will guide corporations and government entities in the creation of barrier-free facilities, providing diverse users with access to commerce, public services, entertainment and employment opportunities.

Buildings and products designed according to the UD standards will benefit everyone, including the 650 million people living with disabilities worldwide and the growing aging population. Businesses stand to reap enormous benefits from the implementation and utilization of UD, including an increase in consumer base, customer loyalty and an expanded labor pool.

More detail:

http://globaluniversaldesign.com/

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Saopštenje za javnost povodom 3. decembra, Medjunarodnog dana osoba sa invaliditetom

Pristupačno okruženje – bolji život za sve

Plakat "Podignimo rampu"Udruženja gradjana „Srbija u pokretu i „Udruženje za reviziju pristupačnosti“, povodom 3. decembra, Međunarodnog dana osoba sa invaliditetom, žele da podsete javnost i medije da je problem nepristupačnog okruženja jedan od najvećih problema sa kojim se suočavaju osobe sa invaliditetom. Ujedno, to je problem i roditelja male dece, starih ljudi, dece, privremeno onesposobljenih i svih koji nemaju invaliditet.
Ovo najbolje potvrdjuje inicijativa studenata beogradskih fakulteta i roditelja iz Beograda, koji su se kroz projekat “Podignimo rampu” organizovali da uklone arhitektonske barijere na vrtićima u kojima borave njihova deca. Potrebu za jednako pristupačnim okruženjem za sve prepoznali su roditelji dece sa i bez teškoća u razvoju, među kojima su i ličnosti iz javnog života. Jedna od njih je glumica Narodnog pozorišta u Beogradu Ivana Šćepanović koja se kao predsednica saveta roditelja u vrtiću Dambo, angažovala da bi se na ovom objektu izgradila rampa. Projekat je podržala i arhitektica Divna Vojinović, koja je volonterski osmislila rešenje uklanjanja prepreke za slobodno kretanje na objektima Dambo i Bubamara.
Osim ova dva, projektom “Podignimo rampu” koji je podržao Fond za otvoreno društvo Srbije, obuhvaćena su još tri beogradska vrtića i objekat Poštanske štedionice na Novom Beogradu. Studenti Arhitektonskog fakulteta su osmislili idejna rešenja za preostale objekte i pojekat je trenutno u fazi pronalaska donatora za izgradnju rampi. Ovo je primer da se problem nepristupačnog okruženja (postojanje arhitektonskih, informacionih i komunikacijskih barijera) može uspešno rešavati ukoliko se shvati kao problem svih nas.

Tim za pristupačnost organizacije “Srbija u pokretu”

Dodatne informacije i kontakt:
Vidan Danković, osnivač organizacije “Udruženje za reviziju pristupačnosti”

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Creating a barrier-free Europe

Most people take it for granted that they can hop on a bus to go shopping, surf the Internet or enjoy a television series. But for the 80 million Europeans with a disability, there may be major obstacles that put these activities out of reach. The European Commission adopted a new strategy to break down these barriers.

The plan outlines how the EU and national governments can empower people with disabilities so they can enjoy their rights. Specific measures over the next decade range from the mutual recognition of national disability cards, the promotion of standardisation to a more targeted use of public procurement and state aid rules.

These measures will have substantial societal benefits, but should also produce a knock-on effect on Europe’s economy. They could for example enhance the EU market for assisted devices and services, which already today has an estimated annual value of over €30 billion.

The main actions are:

Accessibility initiative: considering how to use standardisation, public procurement or state aid rules to make all goods and services accessible to people with disabilities while fostering an EU market for assistive devices (“European Accessibility Act”);
Participation: making sure that persons with disabilities and their families exercise their EU citizenship rights on an equal footing through the mutual recognition of disability cards and related entitlements; facilitating the use of sign language and Braille when exercising EU citizens’ electoral rights or dealing with EU institutions; promoting an accessible format of websites and copyrighted works, such as books;
Funding: ensuring that EU programmes and funds in policy areas relevant to people with disabilities are used to promote sound working conditions for professional and informal care providers and develop personal-assistance schemes;
More cooperation between Member States (through the High Level Group on Disability) and civil society: providing a forum for the exchange of data and policy coordination, in particular on the portability of rights, such as the right to personal assistance;
Awareness-raising such as through the European award for accessible cities;
Data collection and monitoring while also identifying and promoting successful support structures put in place by Member States at national level.
The strategy includes a list of concrete actions and a timetable. The Commission will regularly report on the plan’s achievements and progress complying with its obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities which it has signed.

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

Design for All Foundation Awards 2011 – Open for Applications

Design for All Foundation Awards 2011 – Open for Applications
The Design for All Foundation wants to acknowledge companies, entities and administrations worldwide that promote the Design for All in environments, products and services.

The prize will be awarded in Barcelona on February 24, 2011. The application period is open till January 15, 2011.

http://www.designforall.org/en/awards/awards2011.php

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare

examples-of-sustainable-design from comeongreen.blogspot.com

Sustainable planning

Urban planners that are interested in achieving sustainable development or sustainable cities use various design principles and techniques when designing cities and their infrastructure. These include Smart Growth theory, Transit-oriented development, sustainable urban infrastructure and New Urbanism. Smart Growth is an urban planning and transportation theory that concentrates growth in infill sites within the existing infrastructure of a city or town to avoid urban sprawl; and advocates compact, transit-oriented development, walkable, bicycle-friendly land use, including mixed-use development with a range of housing choices. Transit-oriented development attempts to maximise access to public transport and thereby reduce the need for private vehicles. Public transport is considered a form of Sustainable urban infrastructure, which is a design approach which promotes protected areas, energy-efficient buildings, wildlife corridors and distributed, rather than centralized, power generation and waste water treatment. New Urbanism is more of a social and aesthetic urban design movement than a green one, but it does emphasize diversity of land use and population, as well as walkable communities which inherently reduce the need for automotive travel.

Both urban and rural planning can benefit from including sustainability as a central criterion when laying out roads, streets, buildings and other components of the built environment. Conventional planning practice often ignores or discounts the natural configuration of the land during the planning stages, potentially causing ecological damage such as the stagnation of streams, mudslides, soil erosion, flooding and pollution. Applying methods such as scientific modelling to planned building projects can draw attention to problems before construction begins, helping to minimise damage to the natural environment.

Cohousing is an approach to planning based on the idea of intentional communities. Such projects often prioritize common space over private space resulting in grouped structures that preserve more of the surrounding environment.

Watershed assessment of carrying capacity; estuary, riparian zone restoration and groundwater recharge for hydrologic cycle viability; and other opportunities and issues about Water and the environment show that the foundation of smart growth lies in the protection and preservation of water resources. The total amount of precipitation landing on the surface of a community becomes the supply for the inhabitants. This supply amount then dictates the carrying capacity – the potential population – as supported by the “water crop.”

Sustainable architecture

Sustainable architecture is the design of sustainable buildings. Sustainable architecture attempts to reduce the collective environmental impacts during the production of building components, during the construction process, as well as during the lifecycle of the building (heating, electricity use, carpet cleaning etc.) This design practice emphasizes efficiency of heating and cooling systems; alternative energy sources such as solar hot water, appropriate building siting, reused or recycled building materials; on-site power generation – solar technology, ground source heat pumps, wind power; rainwater harvesting for gardening, washing and aquifer recharge; and on-site waste management such as green roofs that filter and control stormwater runoff. This requires close cooperation of the design team, the architects, the engineers, and the client at all project stages, from site selection, scheme formation, material selection and procurement, to project implementation.

Sustainable architects design with sustainable living in mind. Sustainable vsgreen design is the challenge that designs not only reflect healthy processes and uses but are powered by renewable energies and site specific resources. A test for sustainable design is — can the design function for its intended use without fossil fuel — unplugged. This challenge suggests architects and planners design solutions that can function without pollution rather than just reducing pollution. As technology progresses in architecture and design theories and as examples are built and tested, architects will soon be able to create not only passive, null-emission buildings, but rather be able to integrate the entire power system into the building design. In 2004 the 59 home housing community, the Solar Settlement, and a 60,000 sq ft (5,600 m2) integrated retail, commercial and residential building, the Sun Ship, were completed by architect Rolf Disch in Freiburg, Germany. The Solar Settlement is the first housing community world wide in which every home, all 59, produce a positive energy balance.

Sustainable landscape and garden design

Sustainable landscape architecture is a category of sustainable design and energy-efficient landscaping concerned with the planning and design of outdoor space. Design techniques include planting trees to shade buildings from the sun or protect them from wind, using local materials, on-site composting and chipping to reduce green waste hauling, and also may involve using drought-resistant plantings in arid areas (xeriscaping) and buying stock from local growers to avoid energy use in transportation.

Sustainable graphic design

Sustainable graphic design considers the environmental impacts of graphic design products (such as packaging, printed materials, publications, etc.) throughout a life cycle that includes: raw material; transformation; manufacturing; transportation; use; and disposal. Techniques for sustainable graphic design include: reducing the amount of materials required for production; using paper and materials made with recycled, post-consumer waste; printing with low-VOC inks; and using production and distribution methods that require the least amount of transport.

Sustainable Agriculture

Sustainable agriculture adheres to three main goals:

  • environmental health,
  • economic profitability,
  • social and economic equity.

A variety of philosophies, policies and practices have contributed to these goals. People in many different capacities, from farmers to consumers, have shared this vision and contributed to it. Despite the diversity of people and perspectives, the following themes commonly weave through definitions of sustainable agriculture.

There are strenuous discussions — among others by the agricultural sector and authorities — if existing pesticide protocols and methods of soil conservation adequately protect topsoil and wildlife. Doubt has risen if these are sustainable, and if agrarian reforms would permit an efficient agriculture with fewer pesticides, therefore reducing the damage to the ecosystem.

For more information on the subject of sustainable agriculture: ”UC Davis: Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program”.

Domestic machinery and furniture

Automobiles, home appliances and furnitures can be designed for repair and disassembly (for recycling), and constructed from recyclable materials such as steel, aluminum and glass, and renewable materials, such as Zelfo, wood and plastics from natural feedstocks. Careful selection of materials and manufacturing processes can often create products comparable in price and performance to non-sustainable products. Even mild design efforts can greatly increase the sustainable content of manufactured items.

Improvements to heating, cooling, ventilation and water heating

  • Absorption refrigerator
  • Annualized geothermal solar
  • Earth cooling tubes
  • Geothermal heat pump
  • Heat recovery ventilation
  • Hot water heat recycling
  • Passive cooling
  • Renewable heat
  • Seasonal thermal storage
  • Solar air conditioning
  • Solar hot water

Disposable products

Detergents, newspapers and other disposable items can be designed to decompose, in the presence of air, water and common soil organisms. The current challenge in this area is to design such items in attractive colors, at costs as low as competing items. Since most such items end up in landfills, protected from air and water, the utility of such disposable products is debated.

Eco fashion and home accessories

Creative designers and artists are perhaps the most inventive when it comes to upcycling or creating new products from old waste. A growing number of designers upcycle waste materials such as car window glass and recycled ceramics, textile offcuts from upholstery companies, and even decommissioned fire hose to make belts and bags. Whilst accessories may seem trivial when pitted against green scientific breakthroughs; the ability of fashion and retail to influence and inspire consumer behaviour should not be underestimated. Eco design may also use bi-products of industry, reducing the amount of waste being dumped in landfill, or may harness new sustainable materials or production techniques e.g. fabric made from recycled PET plastic bottles or bamboo textiles.

Energy Sector

Sustainable technology in the energy sector is based on utilizing renewable sources of energy such as solar, wind, hydro, bioenergy, geothermal, and hydrogen. Wind energy is the world’s fastest growing energy source; it has been in use for centuries in Europe and more recently in the United States and other nations. Wind energy is captured through the use of wind turbines that generate and transfer electricity for utilities, homeowners and remote villages. Solar power can be harnessed through photovoltaics, concentrating solar, or solar hot water and is also a rapidly growing energy source.

The availability, potential, and feasibility of primary renewable energy resources must be analyzed early in the planning process as part of a comprehensive energy plan. The plan must justify energy demand and supply and assess the actual costs and benefits to the local, regional, and global environments. Responsible energy use is fundamental to sustainable development and a sustainable future. Energy management must balance justifiable energy demand with appropriate energy supply. The process couples energy awareness, energy conservation, and energy efficiency with the use of primary renewable energy resources.

Water Sector

Sustainable water technologies have become an important industry segment with several companies now providing important and scalable solutions to supply water in a sustainable manner.

Beyond the use of certain technologies, Sustainable Design in Water Management also consists very importantly in correct implementation of concepts. Among one of these principal concepts is the fact normally in developed countries 100% of water destined for consumption, that is not necessarily for drinking purposes, is of potable water quality. This concept of differentiating qualities of water for different purposes has been called “fit-for-purpose”. This more rational use of water achieves several economies, that are not only related to water itself, but also the consumption of energy, as to achieve water of drinking quality can be extremely energy intensive for several reasons.

Posted by Beve @ http://comeongreen.blogspot.com/

Google ReaderTwitterLinkedInFacebookPrintFriendlyShare